exchange server domain and web hosting: <b>low cost web site hosting</b> page<BR>

low cost web site hosting Reviews & News

Hostican uptime for November 2007: 99.9% uptime

The ideal situation is to place as few ads as possible in positions that are as prominent as possible, but at the same time to make the ads as invisible as possible. The less folks notice loud advertising on your sites, the less offended they’ll be and the more they will click on your ads. Also remember that the fewer the advertisements on the site the higher the value of your clicks is bound to be for the few ads displayed.

Web Development Cheat Sheets

Fri, 04 Apr 2008 10:00:22 +0000
I am about to let you in on a little secret. Now see, you might look at your average web hosting guru and say, “Wow, he knows a lot about web hosting - I want to grow up and be like him some day”. What they don’t tell you is that all ...]

This is one of the best reverse ip tools I have ever seen. Most reverse ip tools do not show you nearly all the sites hosted on a server and sometimes there users are even charged for a premium service to use the full tool. At first, I thought it was capable of actually displaying all domains hosted on a server. However, it doesn’t because I checked one of my servers and it got only 3 out of 7 domains on ip address. But, in other cases it seems to list a long list of domains hosted on a server. Over at digg.com, users are having fun poking around on government and scientology sites to see what domains are hosted.

NJ court upholds expectation of privacy in IP addresses

Wed, 23 Apr 2008 12:15:00 -0500
The Supreme Court of New Jersey joined a small, but growing, number of state courts who have ruled that individuals have an expectation of privacy in the IP addresses assigned to them by their ISPs. The unanimous decision in State v. Reid was based on the New Jersey state Constitution, rather than the U.S. Constitution.

At base, the court held that a demand for an IP address must be connected with some sort of judicial proceeding, and not a simple subpoena issued by a court without any kind of review. The court stated that the demand for the IP address must “bear some possible relationship” to an investigation. That relationship can be demonstrated by requiring that the subpoena be issued as part of the grand jury process, rather than through a process in which a subpoena may be issued without any demonstration of relevance. The court refused to go further, and require that a subpoena be issued by a grand jury only upon demonstration of probable cause (the standard necessary to issue a warrant).

This decision shows the difference in privacy rights that is developing between state constitutions and the U.S. constitution. Federal courts have routinely held that there is no Constitutionally based expectation of privacy in IP addresses, while state courts are increasingly interpreting their constitutions the opposite way. Like many similar state vs. Federal issues, these different interpretations are ironic since most state constitutions are based on the Federal constitution. However state courts have a long history of interpreting their constitutions differently than the U.S. constitution.

For hosts, this decision reinforces the need to require some sort of service of process prior to disclosing information about your customers. It’s important to note that the ISP in this case, Comcast, was not a party to the suit, and not held to be liable for its response to the defective subpoena. However, what this case does illustrate is the growing body of law supporting customer’s expectation of privacy in information generated by their use of technology.

From a micro perspective, hosts should always require that any request for customer information be part of a judicial proceeding, or otherwise authorized by law. From a macro perspective, it should cause those who are interested in commercializing this information to be careful in how customer information is used. The line between a host’s ownership of information generated by customer’s use of its technology, and a customer’s expectation of privacy, becomes thinner with every decision in this area.